We've got a good occasion to ponder this question: Today is the 16th UNESCO World Press Freedom Day. Yes, of course we have to say, the spontaneous one. Because in comparison with African, Asian, Eastern European or Latin American (Fast) dictatorships we have freedom of the press clear. We can write what we want. Oh, really?
No, say others, we have no real freedom of the press. Who is right? Recently
I have noticed a dispute between a Abiturientin and a social studies teacher who has always responded angrily when the student put the press in question. He wanted to absolutely do not recognize, especially not from the mouth of an East European who was so clearly a censorship country years ago. Almost the old enemy on the boil ... Lives here and criticize our press ... It was an alert student who has just noticed that many seem content controlled.
Just what is clearly a journalist in the world today. We have frequently zero content on pages 1, when major and minor releases, print or online, whatever. We learn nothing, because a news blackout imposed is to be released to the website. First, if tailored and held, the details come fully to the public.
controlled attention and approval could be baptized the same. We present decision makers happy to give that feeling that everything was according to our wishes, done correctly in the national interest. The details are laid out late or have to be researched in order to provide a little more butter before for information. An ancient means which exists in the most extreme form in a dictatorship and to a lesser extent in a democracy (because we think so immediately to the democratic dictatorship and vice versa). Searches, orders at break of the lock, surveillance of journalists, etc. are the phenomena that occur then only in our 'fight leaves "again and will otherwise not much room.
a clear indication what the journalist does not indicate, however, is the voice. Anyone who looks at the forums of newspapers looks very clear that provide the fewest leaves its readers public open space. Instead, well hidden in the off forums where readers can find some info. Some not listed in search engines, so as not to be found. Well, some things are also pretty hollow and offensive, but still. And what is modern with the link? Nothing prohibited! Press law and other newspapers should the opinions of third parties not accept - via a link! Each allegedly liable for what the Third mortised elsewhere, especially if it is radical, pornographic, criminal or otherwise. So everything is clear. Such freedom of expression, which we do, even with a majority of education, is only permissible form, collecting signatures, club, party, Foundation etc. pp. Other ideas than those authorized are not allowed publicly.
_____________________
0 comments:
Post a Comment